1. SPS Accounts:
    Do you find yourself coming back time after time? Do you appreciate the ongoing hard work to keep this community focused and successful in its mission? Please consider supporting us by upgrading to an SPS Account. Besides the warm and fuzzy feeling that comes from supporting a good cause, you'll also get a significant number of ever-expanding perks and benefits on the site and the forums. Click here to find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
You are currently viewing Boards o' Magick as a guest, but you can register an account here. Registration is fast, easy and free. Once registered you will have access to search the forums, create and respond to threads, PM other members, upload screenshots as well as access many other forum features unavailable to guests.

BoM cultivates a truly friendly and welcoming atmosphere. We have been aiming for quality over quantity with our forums from their inception, and believe that this excellence is truly tangible and treasured by our members. We'd love to have you join us today and convince yourself!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you've forgotten your username or password, click here.

Why I did not vote

Discussion in 'Alley of Lingering Sighs' started by SlickRCBD, Apr 6, 2017.

?

Should I have voted anyway?

This poll will close on Oct 6, 2017 at 2:43 AM.
  1. Yes, leave the school board blank and vote for the uncontested candidates

    75.0%
  2. No, you didn't need to bother.

    25.0%
  1. SlickRCBD Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,501
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    I was just in an argument with somebody when I said I did not vote yesterday in the local election.
    I looked at the sample ballot that is mailed to everyone, and saw that all but two of the elections were unopposed. In fact, for one board there were four seats up for election and only three candidates. A recent article in the paper mentioned this.
    In fact, the only two things I could vote for that would make any difference were the school boards. I haven't been in high school since 1997 and obviously even longer since grade school, I don't have any kids and no prospects to even practice making them at the moment. I'm out of touch with the schools, have no idea what the current issues are or what the candidates stand for, and don't really have much motivation to do so.
    I figured I'd let people with a stake in the schools choose who gets on the board. I don't own land, so I don't even pay the bills (the schools are paid for with property taxes).

    So, given that the only offices that interested me were unopposed, and the only ones with candidates to actually choose from I had no stake in, I decided not to vote.

    What's the point in voting for mayor or trustee when in the latter case you pick 3 and there are only 3 names to pick from? The village president was unopposed.

    Next year I am definitely going to vote Bruce Rauner out of office, and I might put a Democrat in the U.S. House depending on who runs just to help oppose Trump. I have no party affiliation or loyalty however.
     
  2. pplr Gems: 18/31
    Latest gem: Horn Coral


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,006
    Media:
    2
    Likes Received:
    29
    I usually vote. I live in Wisconsin which has some different situations than Illinois-and different problems (or similar problems on different scales).

    We have elections for judges and local officials, like some school boards, in spring and I typically vote in those to oppose Walker's appointees. Often these don't matter much too much but there are times when it can turn out to later. For example there are currently a couple of people on Wisconsin's State Supreme court that are largely there because Walker appointed them. No joke.

    Walker took the least experienced (but most political) candidate for judge at a county level (there was a list of applicants). He appointed that person. When that person faced a County election (with less than 1 year on the bench) a 3rd party organization dumped $100k on a race for County Judge (this is unusual). Then Walker appointed this same person to a spot that opened up on a State Appeals Court, ditto for the state Supreme Court. And for his last appointee to that level he just appointed someone who wasn't a judge at all.

    But Walker knows the value of having a packed State Supreme Court, they let off his campaign the last time his people were caught breaking state law.




    Granted I take the time to find out about local candidates and I sympathize with facing elections with a shortage of candidates (must of the races for judge had 1 name listed in each election-not hard to figure out the incumbent there).

    But there was also a referendum and I make a point of voting in those (though I sometimes get annoyed at the wording being used to obscure the impact of what a referendum is about-the state government often does this though it isn't totally alone.) Sometimes I don't even know there is a referendum until voting has started.

    What branch of government sent you a sample ballot? I usually only see one if I hunt for it online or in the newspaper.

    If I was in your position I would try to find out some info on the people running for school board.
     
  3. SlickRCBD Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,501
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    I believe it was the Cook County Clerk's Office.
    I don't ever remember seeing a referendum that wasn't on the sample ballot. There were no referendums mentioned in the paper affecting my town, although it seemed that the next town over in every direction had one.
    There were no judges mentioned in the paper either, but I remember there are always a lot of judges on the ballot in the gubernatorial election years, which is next year.
    Heck, a lot of times in the year between the gubernatorial election and the Presidential election (aka the year after we elect the governor), there is no election at all, we often only have elections only 3 out of every 4 years and the turnout in the one between the Presidential election and the gubernatorial ( aka the year after we elect the President) is always dismal.
    I just added to the dismal turnout because I felt I had nothing to vote for. There were only two races with any choice, and they were for the school boards that I am out of touch with.
    I did vote for the school boards in my senior year of high school and it was the very first time I ever voted, but that was 20 years ago. I'm pretty sure I did the same 4 years later.
     
  4. Keneth Gems: 27/31
    Latest gem: Emerald


    Resourceful Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,588
    Likes Received:
    147
    Gender:
    Male
    I haven't voted on anything in well over a decade. It's like pissing against the wind, so what would be the point.
     
  5. SlickRCBD Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,501
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    Personally, given that with the exceptions of referendums, everything is always for multiple year terms, we should probably move to bi-annual elections since few people turn out for these off-year (or odd-year) elections.
    The [legitimate] argument the other way is that the Governor race and the Presidential race along with the House and Senate (state and local) tend to overshadow the local elections, so this gives the local officials a chance to be heard without having to compete with the voter's attention with the bigger elections with more money.

    They do have a point, on the other hand not enough people seem to pay attention to the off-year elections anyways.
     
  6. pplr Gems: 18/31
    Latest gem: Horn Coral


    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,006
    Media:
    2
    Likes Received:
    29
    Yeah, I can see the point each way. Maybe it is an argument to teach more civics in high school.

    I'd support having governors (usually 4 year terms anyway) elected at the same time as the presidential election.

    Its an important post but, like a US Senate Race, it can happen alongside a Presidential race without problems. Come to think of it judicial races, especially for the State Supreme Court, could be run then too-more people would probably vote in those too.


    I understand the cynicism but think the would be the point is detached from reality.
    Sure, 1 vote isn't likely to swing and election. And some element of party loyalty, favors owed, and whatever would probably hold a level of sway over most candidates on the ballot.

    But despite all that the party and person elected both matter, and if people vote that can impact that.

    I'm sure there are people within his own party that would have done things I don't like but I strongly suspect they wouldn't have pushed the same level of corruption or general douchebaggery Gov. Walker has already put through. And he would have had a harder time doing it if either fewer of his own party were in the state legislature or those who were happen to have less partisanship, more integrity, or both.

    I know someone whose insurance company (paid up btw) walked away while this person was still in the hospital. Obamacare really cut down on this. Now there may be things in Obamacare that are problems but ending that practice was still a big step froward-and it wouldn't have happen without a bunch of people voting both Obama in and a bunch of Congressmen and women that would pass it.

    There are real world impacts because who is elected matters. And, comparing the past 2 Presidential elections, you have an election where a lot of people voted (Obama) and comparatively few (Trump). So sometimes elections are determined by the number of people turning out and voting (high or low).
     
  7. Keneth Gems: 27/31
    Latest gem: Emerald


    Resourceful Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,588
    Likes Received:
    147
    Gender:
    Male
    I get what you're saying, but around here, there are just bad and worse options, and most people are generally dumb enough to vote for the worse one. Reason and common sense are in such a distinct minority that everyone single one of us who happen to possess a shred of either voting would not make one bit of difference in the end.

    Democracy is a joke, especially on a smaller scale, and I refuse to be the stooge participating in the farce.
     
  8. SlickRCBD Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,501
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't see what they could have done better in MY high school civics. About the only thing I can think of is to have a mock election similar to what was done back in 4th and 8th grade. I was three months too young for the '96 election.
    Personally, I think they should make it so that somebody 16 or older in school should be allowed to vote for the school board, if only so they can get a real election while still in high school. Only a small percentage of high school students get to vote. If they are old enough to drive, perhaps they can be old enough to have a say in how the school is run?



    The judges, senators, and representatives at both state and federal level are all elected in even numbered years. In Illinois, The Presidential Race and the Gubernatorial Race are in alternating even numbered years. So are the Cook County level elections in the Gubernatorial year. The odd numbered years are exclusively for local elections and referendums. The latter of which can come at any time.



    Almost ten years ago Arlene Mulder, our then-Mayor who spent most of her 25 years in office unopposed had a contender that almost beat her, she only won by 7 votes. It would have been six votes if my mother hadn't gone into the hospital right before the election. I remember afterwards her ranting that she wished she had found some way to get out of the hospital and to the poll (only about a mile away from the hospital) and find five or six other people to get in there and vote.

    I live in a state that voted overwhelmingly for Hillary, I can't understand what people were thinking when they voted for Trump, and most of the people I know are of the same mindset.
    I didn't like either candidate, I voted for Gary Johnson simply because I couldn't vote for either of the major party candidates. I liked both him and Jill Stein far better. Heck, I'd have rather had Trump on the Green ticket and Hillary on the Libertarian with Jill and Gary on the Democrats and Republicans.


    Actually, Democracy, true Democracy works really well on a much smaller scale. So does communism. Many churches and co-ups basically use communism.
    It is when you try to scale it up to something the size of the United States that both run into problems.
    True Democracy fails outside a very small community, which is why you go with a representative republic instead with elected leaders.
    That too can sometimes start to break down when you have far too many diverse people with too few leaders. Too many leaders and you wind up with the same problems as true democracy, too many diverse voices that cannot make agreements.
    Hence the quote that goes along the lines of "Democracy is the second worst form of government, just ahead of all the other forms. "
     
  9. Keneth Gems: 27/31
    Latest gem: Emerald


    Resourceful Adored Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    2,588
    Likes Received:
    147
    Gender:
    Male
    Democracy works well on a micro scale or a macro scale of mostly congruous people. So, it probably works well for the state of New York, but it largely fails for the entirety of USA (in spite of its electoral college). It works well for a student council, but it fails miserably in a small, diverse country like mine. All in all, I just don't care. If shit goes pear-shaped, I'll simply leave the country.
     
  10. T2Bruno

    T2Bruno The only source of knowledge is experience ★ SPS Account Holder Adored Veteran New Server Contributor [2012] (for helping Sorcerer's Place lease a new, more powerful server!) Torment: Tides of Numenera SP Immortalizer (for helping immortalize Sorcerer's Place in the game!)

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    9,717
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    429
    Gender:
    Male
    Cook County?!?! Hell, I thought in Chicago your first few votes don't even count for much ... vote early and vote often.
     
  11. SlickRCBD Gems: 23/31
    Latest gem: Black Opal


    Resourceful Veteran

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Messages:
    1,501
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    61
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm a suburbanite. We have influence because the Cook County Board's trustees are divided up between Chicago and the suburbs. The city is the only one that gets to elect more than one trustee. I don't remember the details anymore, but it is set so the suburbs get a say at the county level. I _think_ there are 8 trustees and Chicago gets to elect two. I don't remember anymore.
    That said, I'm only a little over four miles from the boarder to Lake county to the north, and DuPage isn't that far to the south of me.
     

Share This Page

Sorcerer's Place is an independent project run entirely by fans and for fans. Maintaining Sorcerer's Place and a stable environment for all our hosted sites requires a substantial amount of time and money on a regular basis, so please consider supporting us to keep the site up & running smoothly. Thank you!