My god they couldn't have picked anyone worse! The WWF is SO poo!

DDP = face
DDP = married
DDP = trhee time, three time, three time WCW champ, what's all this 'getting to the top' bull about?

Grrrr

I love wrestlers, but...

Don't you think it would be better to argue in the chatroom? :p

[This message has been edited by Darien Noella (edited July 07, 2001).]

Shut up, just stop proving me wrong!! :)

Well, I don't have time to chat anymore, so here's my 3 cents.

First, the Page interview was poor at least. Why was he talking about WCW like it was second rate, even if it was. He should have positioned himself on equal footing with Taker because the WCW/WWF feud as a whole needs both companies to be strong, because jabronies v/s superstars = no buy rates. Now, page is a face, which is why I'm sure he blew off the perverted/creepy aspects of the stalking stuff with his little smarmy too-cool-for-school promo. Still makes him a face to WCW fans at least. And, yeah he's married, but the WWF hasn't signed Kimberly Page, and may not, so it isn't important really. Besides, I thought the last time we saw Kimberly, she was doing her best Sable impression and was aligned with Bischoff. Now I agree he wasn't the best choice, but of their choices, he was as good as anyone. Steiner would have been better, but he can hardly walk, so he ain't gonna be signed anytime soon. Scott Hall would have been a great choice as well, but you can thank Kevin Nash for messing up his chances of being in that position right now. Otherwise, who would have been better? At least it wasn't Kane for god's sake. And Page can carry Taker to a decent match I'm sure.

frankly i ahve to say that i hate DDP, and i like tkaer, take a guess at who im rooting for ;)

ooh ooh I know! Ricky Steamboat!