Why all the characters from Baldur's Gate II are so nasty?The statistics ar realy stupid,some mages have 17 int.,some fighters have 17 str(no good damange?),some druids and clerics have 12-14 wis.(no bonus spells?)...And why all of them had con. so low(Viconia,Aerie etc.)?In multyplayer i make many characters and even if i want I could not make a more stupid paladin like Keldron or a low multyclass like Aerie...

Well, if all the chars have 18/xx str, 18 dex, 16-18 con then I'll be the first one to make this topic.

Why some mages have 17 int ? Because they can and / orthey just want to do that. In my opinion, you has those stats first (from birth ?), then you chose which class suits you best, see ? those NPCs don't have any chance to roll their stats like you :shake:

Simple. The game would be piss easy if all the joinable NPC's were super-human.

I like the fact that the characters are not perfect.

Your main character is a child of Baal, so give them the super stats. A child of Baal should be more mighty than any NPC you can get!

Well, there's Sarevok, who has 95 stats, it's difficult to be better than him in terms of stats.

Though he was a child of Bhaal as well. ;)

You could edit their attributes via Shadowkeeper if they annoy you. This way you don't have to play a multiplayer game .

Why all the characters from Baldur's Gate II are so nasty? Some of the less used BG1 NPC's are much worse.
:p