Elios
Sat, 22nd Feb '03, 11:49am
The difficulty in finding a solution to the nuclear predicament may make it easy to assume that there is none. If there is none, the best we can do is to muddle through, paying no special heed to the nuclear predicament , hoping it will all come out in the end.
But can we take effective action to avoid the choice of war?
There may be factors in the human situation that so limit and influence our choices that, over the long term, the choice to go to nuclear war, whether that war be between the superpowers, between a nuclear power and a non nuclear power , will almost certainly be made. There are three factors that make nuclear war vitually inevitable. First, humans are gentically predisposed to agression. Second, the interests of nations unavoidably come into conflict, resulting in war. Third, national leaders continue to choose policies that are not effective in avoiding war. Do these factors show that nuclear war will almost certainly be chosen whatever we do?
But can we take effective action to avoid the choice of war?
There may be factors in the human situation that so limit and influence our choices that, over the long term, the choice to go to nuclear war, whether that war be between the superpowers, between a nuclear power and a non nuclear power , will almost certainly be made. There are three factors that make nuclear war vitually inevitable. First, humans are gentically predisposed to agression. Second, the interests of nations unavoidably come into conflict, resulting in war. Third, national leaders continue to choose policies that are not effective in avoiding war. Do these factors show that nuclear war will almost certainly be chosen whatever we do?