hi,
i got a lvl 16 kensai with 18 str 17 dex and 17 int dual wielding CF and Daystar.i did all stronghold quests and almost all other quests :D.Im just to go give 20000gp to Gaelan. Now i dont know to what class i should dual him: thief or mage? or even not to dual him.

1.)I would dual him to a thief because he would do awesome damage with backstab and with the special ability "use any item" i could wear armor and braces.

2.)I would dual him to a mage so he could cast defensive spells, cast magical swords like blade of disaster and wearing robes.

3.)I wouldn't dual him because so he would get a even better fighter.:)

Any suggestions?

1. Why do you have CF in Chapter 2?

2. It's too late to dual, IMO, unless you're soloing, which I'll assume you are, given your level and chapter stage.

3. Dual to what you need to. If your party (assuming you are in a party) lacks a mage, dual to a mage. If your party lacks a thief, dual to a thief. However, since you already spent so much points on INT, you might as well take advantage of that.

4. Edit your thread so there's no ToB stuff.

5. I'm sick and tired of Kensai-anything threads, but they just go on and on and on . . .
Just search for "kensai" and see what I mean.

Sorry for being so harsh, but I just can't stand Kensai-related topics.


[This message has been edited by creudzfeldt-jakob (edited February 22, 2002).]

I m not soloing,
my party is:

me
minsc
keldorn
anomen
jaheira
nalia(to be replaced with imoen)

Why its too late to dual?

It's pretty much too late to dual because you'd have to accumulate another 16 level's worth of XP to get to be a Kensai/whatever.

I guess ur right, i wont dual him to anything.

I searched for "kensai" and i found many topics like this, so im sory for posting a
kensai topic.

[Since you're learning about the search engine, also learn that no form of l33t is allowed here. No u instead of you, no r instead of are, etc. Go read the forum rules like you were asked when you registered.] -Tal

[This message has been edited by Taluntain (edited February 23, 2002).]