Sorcerer's Place Stores: Games, Books, DVDs, Merchandise (buying via these links & our affiliated stores below helps support the site - thanks!) |
||
Have you liked us yet? |
![]()
![]() |
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Temple of Elemental Evil For posts concering Troika's Dungeons & Dragons: The Temple of Elemental Evil: A Classic Greyhawk Adventure. (Check out our ToEE Online Walkthrough). |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Gems: 17/31
Latest gem: Star Diopside |
I think I am going to play a good party...
Probably... Paladin Fighter Cleric Rogue Mage ...then try to pick up a bard, monk, and another fighter as npc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Next elven archer gets me axe in his belly
|
Well, as with any CRPG, I will first go through it with a good aligned party, which will hold the usual setup, just as you described. Most people will probably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Good alligned, like always. I've never played anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Valar morghulis, valar dohaeris!
|
Always good, but this time without pallies who I lately view as 'too good to be true'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Gems: 9/31
Latest gem: Iol |
Good of course... But one of these days i really have to try evil, never played that before
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Gems: 4/31
Latest gem: Sunstone |
Yep, I'll play a good-aligned party as well. Butt-kicking for goodness and all that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Gems: 25/31
Latest gem: Moonbar |
Neutral and self-serving with evil tendencies...
Probably a solo fighter will do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Gems: 14/31
Latest gem: Chrysoberyl |
I will try it as a goodie at first, but sure I will play the other agliments, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The world changes, we do not, what irony!
|
Probably Good, But I'll sure play Evil! That's must be realy fun to actualy revive the Temple and gain control of it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Gems: 1/31
Latest gem: Turquoise |
Cool topic. I'll play good with maybe a neutral here or there. I can never play evil. I feel like I have to take a bath every time I do!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dordrecht , The Netherlands
Posts: 3,611
Blog Entries: 1
Like: 64
Liked 46 Times in 33 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I usually play as a Morninglord. This time it will be something similar, if possible. A cleric of Pelor, perhaps?
For you guys not that familiar with D&D: Good aligned, preferably NG. Btw: Each time I play an evil character, my NPCs leave my party because my reputation is too good. 'I just - can't - do - it!' |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Gems: 5/31
Latest gem: Andar |
Unfortunately I won't be brave enough to play anything but good the first time around. It always seems easier that way. I wonder when someone will make a game that is based on you being evil instead of good. Yeah, yeah, I know alot of games give options to be evil/neutral but none that I can think of at 4:58am are built around that premise of an evil character with options to be good/neutral. Instead of starting out in Baldurs Gate and such maybe they could start in a Drow City. Oops sorry I rambled..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
How'd an old elf get the blues?
|
I never play one type of alignment. I usually have a good/neutral party, and I'm not planning to play this game with a different kind of party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Gems: 9/31
Latest gem: Iol |
@Silverblade: I think it said in the interview that even neutral characters will leave your party if your too good. It didn't say so outright, but i came to that conclusion when reading it. Am i right or am i just floating in another Galaxy??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
It's simplicity that matters
|
I always start with a good character. After that I do chaotic good (which for some of my friends equals evil but hey, it's their loss). After that either evil or neutral, and after that whichever I didn't play last.
Though if the game is good enough, I will get attached to some characters on my first run. So it usually requires months or even a year before I can (or rather, will) act as an evil character towards the "friends" of my previous life. I have a strong imagination, and it means that I am able to immerse myself within a good story so well that turning against people I cared for in there, make me feel as I might risk doing that in real life as well. [ June 09, 2003, 06:58: Message edited by: Foradasthar ] |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Gems: 25/31
Latest gem: Moonbar |
Bah, I'm surrounded by goody-two shoes!
My first time through BG was as a chaotic neutral fighter who was an ultimate bastard (Killed Ajantis, Minsc, Dynaheir and Edwin for good measure, Jaheira, Khalid and Quayle). Still, I beat down Sarevok's ass. Guess he wasn't evil enough. Neutral Evil for my first main character in TOEE. Probably fighter as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Shura, your a mean bastard!
I'll probably create Morningstar (have a look at Dawn In Shadow in CS), but I haven't decided on an allignment for him yet so I'll close my eyes and move the mouse a bit and use whichever it comes up as .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I usually have varying alignments in my party...I rarely have evil ones though.
Pally - LG Rogue - CN Fighter - CN Cleric - NG Mage - CG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Gems: 5/31
Latest gem: Andar |
Hum... I wonder how a pally could stand being partied with CN chars.
Even LE types are preferable. At least they can agree on fighting Chaotic forces. Short of CE, CN has to be the most distasteful alignment for a pally to be partied with... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Gems: 16/31
Latest gem: Shandon |
I've read something about party alignment, which restricts alignments of party members (e.g. in lawful neutral party can only include lawful or true neutral characters), but I'm not sure that I remember correctly.
My first party will be quite similar like Sir Bel's and Late Night Thinker's: paladin, cleric, wizard, rogue and ranger. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chirofen
Posts: 7,140
Blog Entries: 252
Like: 63
Liked 17 Times in 15 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why do you guys find it so hrad to play Evil?
I'll probably create my usual 8 parties. Probably recreate the People I made from IWD into it. From IWD, to IWD2 to G:tToEE It should be cool. 2 evil parties, 3 good parties, 2 neutral and one Neutral/Good mostly druidic party. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Gems: 3/31
Latest gem: Lynx Eye |
I'll create a party with purly CE. Probally a Mage and Fighter and then pick up a rouge and another fighter as NPCs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Gems: 14/31
Latest gem: Chrysoberyl |
Two good: Paladin and Cleric
Two neutral: Sorcerer and Wizard Two evil: Fighter and Rogue |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
The world changes, we do not, what irony!
|
haaaa, I'll play neutral for sure, being tooo good is boring and evil well is evil, I'll also play a party that are mainly "tree hugger"
Ranger Cleric of Obad-hai Druid (duh) Wizards well it's not a tree hugger but still useful Druid/bard indeed weird but I would really like to create a "Celtic" character a sort of bagpipe player whose travel has given him druidic power... |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Gems: 8/31
Latest gem: Skydrop |
i almost always choose neutral. I (personally) can't be classified as good or evil. So my choice is obvious.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|